Law & courts · press freedom
Leak & whistleblower prosecutions, by president
Prosecutions of government employees and contractors under the Espionage Act for leaking classified information to the press or the public: the measure press-freedom groups use to gauge an administration's war on sources. For nearly a century such cases were vanishingly rare: three or four in all of U.S. history before 2009, depending on the tally. Then the count jumped. The outlier here is not the current president; it is the one whose name is usually attached to the phrase “more than all his predecessors combined.”
Leak prosecutions brought under the Espionage Act, per term.
Beyond prosecutions: pressuring the press
Prosecuting sources is only half the story; the other half is how administrations treat journalists directly, and here the record spreads across parties. Obama's Justice Department secretly seized two months of phone records for about twenty Associated Press lines (2013) and, in a search warrant, named a Fox News reporter a criminal “co-conspirator” for doing his job. In reaction to later revelations, the Biden Justice Department in 2022 codified a bar on subpoenaing reporters' records in leak investigations. In 2025 the Trump II attorney general rescinded that protection, restoring the government's ability to pursue journalists' records. So the press-freedom story does implicate the current administration, but through a policy reversal, not a wave of prosecutions, which is why it sits in this panel rather than in the bar above.