Elections · analysis

Voter fraud is real, and vanishingly rare

It happens, and it gets prosecuted. But the largest public database of proven cases holds 1,480 since 2000, about 1 in 157k registered voters, or 1.6 per million ballots, across 939 million presidential votes. Even the highest state, Minnesota, comes to about 1 in 28,000, over a quarter-century of elections. That is not a crisis, and it is not a reason to make voting harder: the proof-of-citizenship mandates, stricter ID rules, and aggressive purges proposed in its name have, where they've been tried, blocked or flagged far more eligible citizens than fraudsters.

This section makes an argument, unlike the rest of this site: that proven voter fraud is far too rare to justify new barriers to voting. Every number is sourced, and the strongest evidence on the other side is shown, not hidden. The other side →

0.00064%
of registered voters: 1,480 proven cases since 2000 vs 232M voters: 1 in 157k
1.6
proven cases per million presidential ballots, 2000–2024
34
proven in-person impersonation cases in 43 years: the fraud voter ID targets
31,089 vs 39
Kansans blocked by proof-of-citizenship rules vs noncitizens found on its rolls since 1999: the cost →

The electorate vs the fraud, on a logarithmic scale (each step is ten times larger), because on a normal scale the fraud bars would be invisible. Grey: the voters. Light grey: the citizens new rules would burden. Orange: all proven fraud.

On a linear scale, if the ballots bar ran the width of this page, the 1,480 proven cases would be about 1/600,000th of it, far thinner than a single pixel.

Who chose the president: every U.S. resident, 2024

All 340.1 million people living in the United States, by what each could and did do in the 2024 presidential election. Donald Trump won with the votes of 22.7% of residents. About 87 million eligible adults did not vote for president, more than voted for either candidate.

340.1M residents
  • Eligible adults who did not vote for president 87.4M (25.7%)
  • Voted for Donald Trump 77.3M (22.7%)
  • Voted for Kamala Harris 75.0M (22.1%)
  • Voted for someone else 2.9M (0.9%)
  • Adults who could not vote (mostly non-citizens) 24.3M (7.2%)
  • Children under 18 73.1M (21.5%)

Population is the Census estimate for July 1, 2024; votes are the official count. “Could not vote” is the UF Election Lab’s estimate of adult non-citizens (8.2% of adults) and people barred by felony-disenfranchisement laws (2.6 million). The eligible-non-voter slice is the remainder, so it is approximate: it includes about 1.5 million people who cast a ballot but skipped the presidential race, and it runs slightly low because the vote count includes Americans living abroad, who are not in the resident population.

Every state, as a share of its voters

Sorted by cases per million ballots; click any column to re-sort. “% of registered” divides cases since 2000 by the state's 2024 registered voters (active + inactive, EAC survey). North Dakota has no voter registration, so it has no registration-based rate; its 12 cases since 2000 are in the national count, and leaving them out would put the national share at 0.00063%. Even the highest rates are tiny: West Virginia (7.12 per million), Minnesota (6.70 per million), New Hampshire (5.74 per million), North Dakota (5.18 per million), Mississippi (5.08 per million). West Virginia's is 0.0030% of its registered voters. Delaware and Vermont have no cases in the database.

StateCases 1982–2025Since 2000NoncitizenRegistered voters, 2024% of registeredOne case perPer million ballotsMost common typeAudit
West Virginia363601,210,4150.0030%1 in 34k7.12Vote buying
Minnesota13813823,853,6680.0036%1 in 28k6.70Felon voting
New Hampshire292901,008,9520.0029%1 in 35k5.74Double voting
North Dakota12120no registrationn/an/a5.18Petition fraud
Mississippi454302,131,7260.0020%1 in 50k5.08Vote buying
Kentucky626203,548,1360.0017%1 in 57k4.73Vote buying
Wisconsin686813,933,0680.0017%1 in 58k3.19Felon voting
Indiana595904,840,8560.0012%1 in 82k3.15False registration
Alabama414123,868,0400.0011%1 in 94k2.84Absentee fraudaudit
Idaho131301,178,7500.0011%1 in 91k2.66False registrationaudit
Iowa292932,256,7740.0013%1 in 78k2.66Felon votingaudit
North Carolina12382387,854,4640.0010%1 in 96k2.63Vote buyingaudit
District of Columbia550612,9040.00082%1 in 123k2.54Double voting
Arizona404005,075,3370.00079%1 in 127k2.29Double voting
Wyoming440296,9600.0013%1 in 74k2.26False registration
South Dakota660690,3060.00087%1 in 115k2.25Petition fraud
Alaska552611,0780.00082%1 in 122k2.23Noncitizen voting
Connecticut312522,520,6500.00099%1 in 101k2.18Absentee fraud
Kansas171712,031,1190.00084%1 in 119k1.99Double voting
New Jersey535316,630,3640.00080%1 in 125k1.96Absentee fraud
Texas113113418,623,9310.00061%1 in 165k1.84Absentee fraudaudit
Ohio636388,074,0980.00078%1 in 128k1.62False registrationaudit
Missouri303014,388,7870.00068%1 in 146k1.53False registration
Nevada111112,256,2750.00049%1 in 205k1.48False registration
Florida93891515,740,0830.00057%1 in 177k1.44False registration
Tennessee262604,825,6010.00054%1 in 186k1.43False registration
Illinois11754108,970,5410.00060%1 in 166k1.42False registration
Virginia363606,380,6860.00056%1 in 177k1.36Absentee fraudaudit
Oregon181813,060,3740.00059%1 in 170k1.32Double votingaudit
Colorado232314,583,2800.00050%1 in 199k1.27Absentee fraud
New Mexico8701,415,9840.00049%1 in 202k1.25Absentee fraud
Georgia362808,234,3350.00034%1 in 294k1.00Absentee fraudaudit
Pennsylvania453809,175,1330.00041%1 in 241k0.89Absentee fraudaudit
Arkansas6601,835,7230.00033%1 in 306k0.78Absentee fraud
California7170225,720,5970.00027%1 in 367k0.72False registration
Washington151505,597,1560.00027%1 in 373k0.66Absentee fraud
Rhode Island220792,0750.00025%1 in 396k0.61Double voting
Louisiana8803,046,3760.00026%1 in 381k0.58Vote buyingaudit
Montana220800,5730.00025%1 in 400k0.57Absentee fraud
Michigan191918,440,2360.00023%1 in 444k0.55Absentee fraudaudit
Maryland101044,555,2170.00022%1 in 456k0.54Noncitizen voting
Nebraska3301,263,4870.00024%1 in 421k0.52Double voting
Oklahoma5502,442,2110.00020%1 in 488k0.50Ineligible voting
New York2826013,579,4160.00019%1 in 522k0.48Absentee fraud
Utah3302,039,8620.00015%1 in 680k0.39False registrationaudit
Maine2201,223,4680.00016%1 in 612k0.38Double voting
Hawaii510861,3330.00012%1 in 861k0.31False registration
Massachusetts4405,142,3430.00008%1 in 1.3M0.18Absentee fraud
South Carolina1103,851,1870.00003%1 in 3.9M0.07Absentee fraud
Delaware000788,4410%n/a0.00n/a
Vermont000500,9860%n/a0.00n/a
United States1,6191,480100232,363,3620.00064%1 in 157k1.58Absentee fraud
Even the “high” states are measured in thousandths of a percent, and a high rate is not the same as a lot of fraud. These are proven cases that the Heritage Foundation has collected, so a state's rate reflects how hard it looks, how it prosecutes, and how well its cases get reported, as much as how much fraud occurs. Minnesota ranks high because it prosecuted over a hundred ineligible felon voters after 2008; North Carolina leads on noncitizen cases partly because it audits. A state with few cases may simply prosecute few. Heritage calls its database “a sampling,” and undetected fraud, by definition, isn't in it. The rates here are best read as a floor and as a comparison of enforcement, not as a measure of hidden fraud.

The strongest case on the other side

What cuts against this argument

Undetected fraud can't be counted, and supporters of new rules argue that is the point: the Heritage list is a floor. The most rigorous national study of strict photo-ID laws (Cantoni & Pons, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2021) found no significant drop in turnout, for any group, though a GAO study found turnout fell 2–3 points more in Kansas and Tennessee after their laws. Only about 1% of citizens (2.6 million) lack any government photo ID. And noncitizen ballots are real, if rare: Iowa counted 35 in 2024, and Texas and Kansas charged noncitizen voters in 2026.

Why the argument still holds

Grant all of it. The same QJE study found strict ID laws had no effect on fraud either: unsurprising, since the one kind ID stops, impersonation at the polls, is 34 proven cases in 43 years. Proof-of-citizenship rules are a far bigger burden than photo ID: 21.3 million citizens can't readily produce the papers. Where such rules and purges have actually been run, they have flagged or blocked eligible citizens by the hundreds or thousands for every noncitizen found, and the fraud that does occur is caught and prosecuted under existing law. A rule whose costs land on thousands of eligible voters to stop dozens of cases is a bad trade, whichever party proposes it.

The cost of the cure

Kansas blocked 31,089 would-be voters; it had found 39 noncitizens on its rolls since 1999. What proof-of-citizenship rules, ID laws, and purges have cost eligible voters, measured against the fraud they caught.

View →

Election fraud, counted

All 1,619 proven cases by type, year, and state: mostly absentee schemes and ineligible voters, caught under existing law, and what the 2020 reviews found.

View →

Noncitizen voting: rare, and the checks hit citizens

Every state citizenship audit: noncitizens reported at 0.0002%–0.013% of the rolls, while the checks flag eligible citizens by the thousands.

View →