← All charts

Court–executive conflict

Nationwide injunctions against the executive, per year in office

How often federal district courts blocked an administration's policies nationwide, a measurable proxy for court–executive conflict, not a count of constitutional violations. The Supreme Court sharply curtailed the tool in June 2025 (Trump v. CASA), limiting such orders to the parties who actually sued and freezing the last bar mid-game.

100 80 60 40 20 0 ~1.1 ~1.9 ~19 ~6 ~78 Bush Obama Trump I Biden Trump II* 2001–2009 2009–2017 2017–2021 2021–2025 pre-CASA pace, 2025

Raw counts, by source

AdministrationDOJ (Feb 2020)Harvard L. Rev. (2024)CRS (2025)
Bush (8 yrs)126n/a
Obama (8 yrs)1912n/a
Trump I (4 yrs)55†6486
Biden (4 yrs)n/a14 (first 3 yrs)28
Trump II (Jan 20–Jun 27 2025, pre-CASA)n/an/a34
Trump II (year one post-CASA)n/an/a16

The critical reading

Courts, including many Republican appointees, found executive actions unlawful at rates without modern precedent, alongside historically low win rates in ordinary administrative-law cases. On this view, the bars track real executive overreach.

The defense reading

Most injunctions came from judges appointed by the opposing party, in districts chosen by challengers. On this view, the bars partly track judge-shopping and the partisan escalation of a novel judicial weapon that barely existed before 2001.