Corruption tracker · 10 entries

Paying for access

Settlements, donations, club fees, and dinners paid by people and companies with business before the government.

Documented in official filings, court records, or company statementsReported by major news organizations, facts undisputedAlleged an accusation or link that is disputed or unproven

10 entries, most significant first.

DocumentedSep 2025

$86.5 million in settlements from media and tech companies

$86.5M, as listed on his own disclosure

Five companies paid to settle lawsuits Trump had filed personally, each while it had business before his administration: Meta $24.5M, Alphabet (YouTube) $22M, Disney's ABC $16M, Paramount (CBS) $16M, and X $8M. Paramount settled weeks before his FCC approved its $8.4B merger. Most of the money went to his presidential library foundation; YouTube's went to the fund for his ballroom.

Their response: Paramount has said the lawsuit was separate from its merger.

Sources: Trump's 2026 financial disclosure (OGE Form 278e) · NPR (Paramount) · CNBC (Meta) · ABC News (YouTube)

DocumentedOct 2025

The White House ballroom, paid for by companies with federal business

$400M (White House figure); $600M (contractor estimate)

The ballroom's cost has risen from $200M to $400M by the White House's count; the Washington Post reported a contractor estimate of $600M, about half of it public money. The 37 named donors include Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Palantir, and crypto firms; most amounts are secret. The watchdog Public Citizen calculates that the corporate donors held $279B in federal contracts.

Their response: Trump: “I'm paying for it; the country's not.” The White House says it accepts no foreign money for the project.

Sources: Fortune (donor list) · Washington Post · Public Citizen (advocacy group)

DocumentedApr 2025

A record $239 million inaugural fund

$239M raised

The inaugural committee raised more than double the previous record. Donors included a meatpacker ($5M), the crypto firm Ripple ($4.9M), and Meta, Amazon, and Nvidia ($1M each), plus $1M given personally by OpenAI chief Sam Altman; three donors of $2M to $4M were later nominated to administration posts. The committee has not said how the money was spent or what happened to any surplus.

Sources: CNN (via Yahoo) · Washington Post · Inaugural committee FEC filing (April 20, 2025)

ReportedMar 2025

$1 million a plate at Mar-a-Lago

$1M per seat; $5M per meeting (reported)

Invitations from his super PAC priced dinners with the president at his club at $1M per person. Wired reported, citing unnamed sources, that one-on-one meetings were offered for $5M.

Their response: The invitations say Trump is a “featured speaker” and is “not asking for funds.”

Sources: CBS News · Wired (via Yahoo)

AllegedJan 2026

SoftBank's $50 million library gift, then a federal-land lease

$50M to the library

SoftBank confirmed to Democratic lawmakers that it gave $50M to Trump's presidential library in January 2026. Two months later the administration announced a lease of federal land for a SoftBank data center.

Their response: No explanation of the timing was given. The gift is confirmed; a connection to the lease is alleged.

Sources: Sen. Warren release (partisan) · MS NOW

DocumentedApr 2025

Law firms pledged $940 million to stay out of his crosshairs

$940M in pledged legal work (not paid to Trump)

After executive orders punished firms that had represented his opponents, nine firms promised free legal work for causes the administration favors. The four firms that sued instead all won rulings that the orders were unconstitutional.

Their response: Trump: “They're all bending and saying: 'Sir, thank you very much.'”

Sources: Axios · The Hill

DocumentedSep 2026

Trump on the $403 million in his super PAC: “This is my money, that I control”

$403M on hand in his super PAC (FEC filing, via HuffPost); donor money

MAGA Inc., the main pro-Trump super PAC, reported $403.45 million on hand as of July 31, 2026 and had spent about $21 million since the start of 2025, HuffPost reported from its election commission filing. On Sept. 4, 2026 Trump told reporters the group had “around a billion dollars” and said: “This is my money, that I control.” He added that he could keep it for the 2028 election. The money comes from donors, not taxpayers; super PACs may raise unlimited sums but are supposed to operate independently of candidates. Republicans had complained the group was spending on ads about Trump rather than on midterm candidates.

Their response: Trump: “I can spend it for what I want to spend it for.” Asked about 2028: “I could use it for ’28 if I want, sure. I mean, I expect to have money left over.” No separate White House response found.

Sources: HuffPost (Sept. 5, 2026)

ReportedMar 2026

$63 million in settlements pledged to his library went to a fund later dissolved; Democrats ask where it is

$63M in settlement money pledged to the library

ABC, Meta, Paramount and X agreed to direct at least $63 million of their settlements with Trump to his presidential library. The entity created to receive it, the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Fund Inc., was administratively dissolved in Florida in September 2025 after failing to file an annual report, and a separate foundation was set up. Congressional Democrats opened an inquiry in March 2026. In written replies obtained by the New Republic, all four companies confirmed the pledges; only ABC gave detail, saying it expects to direct its money to the new foundation, while Meta and X cited confidentiality terms. No misuse has been shown; the complaint is that the money cannot be traced.

Their response: Sen. Elizabeth Warren: “Not one of these companies can say with any clarity where their multi-million-dollar donations to Donald Trump’s library slush fund are, or where they will go.” No response from Trump or the foundation was found. The New Republic noted it “could prove legally aboveboard” if the money is moved to the IRS-approved foundation.

Sources: The Washington Post (March 11, 2026) · The New Republic (April 20, 2026) · CBS News (July 16, 2025)

AllegedApr 2026

Foreign steelmaker gave ballroom steel; days after Trump mentioned the gift, a tariff change opened a way to halve the duty on its steel

$37M of donated steel, by Trump’s account

The New York Times reported on April 8, 2026 that ArcelorMittal, the Luxembourg-based steel company, is donating steel made in Europe for the structure of the White House ballroom, citing two people familiar with the plans. Trump said in October 2025 that he had been offered a steel donation worth $37 million. Days after that remark, the White House adjusted its tariffs in a way the Times said “could benefit ArcelorMittal, by cutting in half the tariffs applied to exports of automotive steel from its Canadian plant”. The change let the commerce secretary cut the tariffs by up to half for steelmakers with plants in Canada or Mexico; a White House official told the Times that no company had yet received the reduction. ArcelorMittal’s finance chief confirmed the donation on April 30, 2026, saying 600 tonnes had been delivered. The donation and the tariff change are reported facts; a link between them is an inference.

Their response: A White House official told the Times the link was “tenuous”, said that neither ArcelorMittal nor any other company had yet received the tariff exemption, and denied that the company got anything in return for its donation. Spokesperson Davis Ingle said Trump was “making the White House beautiful and giving it the glory it deserves at no cost to the taxpayer”. ArcelorMittal declined to comment to the Times.

Sources: The New York Times (April 8, 2026) · The New York Times, as reprinted by the Hawaii Tribune-Herald (April 10, 2026) · Reuters via Yahoo Finance (April 30, 2026)

AllegedApr 2026

Ballroom funding contract lets donors stay anonymous; 14 of 27 known donors got new federal contracts

14 of 27 known donors got new contracts (Public Citizen count)

On April 22, 2026 the administration released the 14-page “Philanthropic Support Agreement” between the White House, the National Park Service and the Trust for the National Mall, after Public Citizen sued under the Freedom of Information Act; the group says it permits ballroom donors to remain anonymous. In a June 2026 analysis of 27 identified corporate donors, Public Citizen counted 14 that had received new or increased federal contracts in the previous six months, totaling more than $50 billion, and 16 facing federal enforcement actions or with actions suspended. Public Citizen is an advocacy group; many of these firms are long-standing contractors and the counts do not show that any contract was awarded because of a gift.

Their response: In a court filing quoted by Public Citizen, the administration called the donations “an invaluable gift from President Trump and many patriotic private donors who have given Hundreds of Millions of Dollars to build this Project”.

Sources: Public Citizen news release (April 22, 2026) · Public Citizen, “Ballroom Billions” (June 4, 2026)

← His businesses & merchandiseAll categoriesPolicy for sale →